Other languages：繁體中文｜日本語｜한국어

As of October 22, 2026, Notion still has no official Linux desktop app. Linux users can access their workspaces through browsers such as Chrome and Firefox, and edit pages and databases as usual. However, the official offline editing feature is unavailable in the web version. Installing a third-party desktop client also does not necessarily provide the same experience as using Notion on Windows or macOS.

On October 16, a discussion appeared in Reddit's r/Notion community. An Ubuntu user was looking for a Notion Linux client that supported multiple tabs because the web version lacked the familiar desktop tab bar, making it inconvenient to switch between documents. Some people suggested using browser tabs, while others shared their experiences with Lotion, an unofficial client. However, issues with font rendering and compatibility remained.

That same week, two open-source note-taking tools, Morrow and Thought Desk, also attracted attention. Morrow focuses on storing notes as local Markdown files, while Thought Desk emphasizes desktop performance through its use of Rust and Tauri. Both aim to address concerns about offline access, data ownership, and software resource consumption. However, both products are still in the early stages of development, and the feature lists and performance figures published by their developers should not be taken as proof of maturity or stability.

For users who have already centralized their work data in Notion, switching tools also involves database relationships, cross-device synchronization, collaboration, and content exports. This is especially important for knowledge bases built up over many years. Whether the original data structure can be fully preserved after migration may be more important to verify than how many features a new application offers.

Does Notion Have a Linux Desktop App? Official Support Remains Limited to Windows and macOS

Notion's official Help Center currently provides desktop app downloads only for Windows and macOS, explicitly identifying Linux as an unsupported platform. Notion officially recommends using the service through a browser. As for whether a Linux installation package will be released in the future, there is currently no confirmed official release date.

In practice, the web version already covers most common tasks, including document editing, database management, page sharing, and team collaboration. As long as their internet connection is working, Linux users can continue accessing their existing workspaces without having to abandon Notion simply because a desktop application is unavailable.

However, the web and desktop versions do not offer exactly the same features. The official desktop app has its own tab system, tab previews, and desktop notifications. It can also be configured to open search directly when a new tab is created. Although these features do not change the data stored within pages, they affect how users navigate between documents throughout the day.

How Can You Use Multiple Notion Tabs on Linux? Browser vs. Desktop App

The most straightforward way to work with multiple Notion documents simultaneously on Linux is to use the browser's built-in tab functionality. Research materials, project Kanban boards, meeting notes, and article drafts can each be opened in separate tabs, allowing users to switch between them using the browser's tab bar. If clicking an item in the sidebar only changes the page within the current tab, users can copy the page URL and open it in a new tab instead.

This approach is sufficient for ordinary multitasking, but it differs from the tab management built into Notion's desktop app. For example, the desktop version allows users to preview tab contents directly, and certain new features are also introduced to the desktop application first. These differences become more noticeable for people who keep numerous project pages open for extended periods.

Browsers such as Chrome also allow users to install the Notion website as an application that opens in a separate window, providing an experience closer to that of a conventional desktop program. However, these web applications still rely on browser technology. Simply appearing in the Linux application menu does not automatically give them access to every feature available in Notion's official desktop app.

Can Unofficial Notion Linux Clients Like Lotion Replace the Official Desktop App?

Users who want a dedicated window with built-in tabs on Linux can consider Lotion, a community-developed client. Lotion is an unofficial Notion client built with Electron. Its project documentation lists features such as multiple tabs, tab reordering, theme switching, spell checking, and session restoration. Installation packages are also available for certain Linux distributions.

In the Reddit discussion on October 16, 2026, one user reported that Lotion worked during recent testing, although occasional font rendering issues occurred. These problems may not affect every Linux environment, but they illustrate the limitations of third-party desktop applications. When Notion updates its web interface or authentication system, wrapper applications need continued maintenance to remain compatible.

Furthermore, Lotion is not officially supported by Notion, and the availability of open-source code does not mean its installation packages have undergone an independent security audit. When handling company documents, customer information, or managed workspaces, users should verify the application's source, required permissions, and their organization's information security policies before installation. Improving tab management should not come at the expense of increased account or data security risks.

Why Isn't Notion's Offline Mode Available on Linux?

Notion already supports offline editing, but the official feature is restricted to desktop and mobile applications. Standard web browsers remain unsupported. Therefore, even though Linux users can open Notion pages normally in a browser, they cannot use the official process to download selected pages and continue editing them while completely disconnected from the internet.

Upgrading to a paid subscription does not resolve this limitation. According to Notion's official documentation, workspace members on all plans can use offline features in supported applications. Paid plans additionally download recently visited and favorited pages automatically. In other words, plan differences primarily affect how offline content is downloaded. They do not suddenly enable the same functionality in the unsupported Linux web version.

Can Notion Offline Databases Store Only 50 Records?

Notion's offline databases are not subject to a fixed maximum of 50 records. Under the current official rules, when users download a database or a page containing a database, Notion initially downloads the first 50 rows from the first database view. Any records outside that range that are also needed offline must be handled separately.

Suppose a project database contains 300 work records, and its first view is sorted by creation date. By default, Notion downloads the first 50 records in that view rather than automatically selecting the most important records based on how frequently they are used. If someone is preparing for a business trip and needs offline access to older project documents, simply making the database available offline may not be enough.

Subpages have similar limitations. Downloading a parent page in Notion does not automatically save every page beneath it to the device. Features such as external embeds, AI blocks, forms, and buttons may also require an internet connection, while sharing permissions cannot be changed offline.

Therefore, even when using the official Windows or macOS desktop app, enabling offline mode does not mean the entire workspace has been saved to the computer. Before working without an internet connection, users still need to confirm that the necessary data has finished downloading and identify which blocks will remain functional.

Can Data Conflicts Occur When Notion Syncs Offline Edits?

In supported applications, Notion synchronizes changes made offline once the internet connection is restored. However, conflicts may still occur when multiple people edit the same content simultaneously. According to the official documentation, Notion attempts to resolve conflicts involving text edits automatically, but changes to non-text properties, such as database select properties, may be overwritten.

For example, suppose two team members modify the status property of the same task while offline. One changes it to "In Progress," while the other selects "Completed." When they reconnect, both changes may not be preserved. This differs from merging changes to ordinary text paragraphs during collaborative editing. When database properties are involved, users should verify the final synchronization result.

For teams that frequently work across multiple devices, offline availability and synchronization reliability should be evaluated separately. Being able to continue editing without an internet connection is one capability. Whether an application preserves changes, resolves conflicts, and maintains data integrity after reconnecting is another issue that requires practical testing.

What Is Morrow? An Open-Source Notion Alternative for Linux

On October 16, 2026, a developer named Aarav introduced Morrow on Reddit, describing it as a free, open-source, local-first desktop workspace. The software combines note editing, databases, Kanban boards, calendars, and knowledge management features. It aims to let people familiar with Notion's workflow store their data directly on their own computers.

Morrow's design differs significantly from Notion's. Notion primarily manages data through cloud workspaces, and even with offline editing support, synchronization and collaboration still depend on its official services. Morrow, by contrast, starts with local files. Users can edit notes and manage databases without creating an account or connecting to a cloud service.

This distinction is particularly appealing to Linux users who need to write offline, want to manage their own backups, or prefer not to make their personal knowledge bases entirely dependent on a single service. However, Morrow is still a newly released application. Although it offers a broad range of features, its actual stability needs to be supported by more user experience and testing.

How Does Morrow Store Notes and Databases Using Markdown?

Morrow allows users to choose their own storage folder and saves each note as a Markdown file. These files can be read directly using a text editor and managed with Git, Syncthing, or other file backup tools. Users do not need to sign in to Morrow to access their basic text content.

Beyond articles and lists, Morrow offers database views such as tables, Kanban boards, calendars, lists, and galleries. It also supports filtering, sorting, grouping, page relationships, and formula properties. The developer has added features such as bidirectional links, knowledge graphs, daily notes, and whiteboards, allowing the application to handle some forms of structured personal knowledge data in addition to ordinary documents.

However, the ability to preserve Markdown files over the long term does not mean other note-taking applications can fully interpret all of Morrow's features. Ordinary text, headings, and lists are relatively easy to migrate, but database formulas, relationship logic, and view configurations may depend on Morrow's own software.

For example, if a database containing dates, tags, and relationship properties is moved to another Markdown editor, its text content will generally remain available. However, the original automated filtering, calculations, and switchable database views may no longer function. When evaluating data portability, it is better to examine whether the content can be preserved separately from whether the original functionality can be recreated.

Does Morrow Support Notion Imports? Is Its Linux Version Stable?

Morrow's project documentation lists support for importing data exported from Notion. According to the developer, the application can process Markdown, CSV, page hierarchies, and some database properties. It can also open existing Obsidian folders. These capabilities provide a basic foundation for migrating data from other note-taking tools, but they do not currently guarantee that every Notion database can be converted completely.

Linux support also requires a more careful distinction. Morrow's release information already lists builds for Windows, macOS, and Linux. However, early project documentation also warns that the macOS and Linux builds have not been sufficiently tested on actual devices and that the installation packages have not been code-signed.

This does not necessarily mean the Linux version will fail to work. However, there is a difference between "an installation package is available" and "the application has been verified to run reliably across different Linux distributions." For users managing large numbers of attachments, database relationships, or personal documents intended for long-term storage, it is advisable to test importing, editing, and the application's state after restarting with a sample database before committing to regular use.

Additionally, when Morrow was first introduced on October 16, the developer emphasized that it did not depend on AI. However, subsequent project information mentioned optional AI integrations. A more accurate interpretation is that Morrow's core note-taking and database functions do not require cloud AI services, rather than that the software is guaranteed never to offer AI features in the future.

Thought Desk: Is This Open-Source Note-Taking Tool Focused on Low Memory Usage Worth Watching?

Unlike Morrow, which emphasizes file portability, Thought Desk places greater emphasis on performance and the desktop user experience. This open-source note-taking tool uses Rust, Tauri, and Svelte. Its developer aims to reduce the resource consumption associated with conventional web-based applications by adopting a lighter desktop architecture.

Thought Desk's planned features include nested pages, block editing, databases, and full-text search. It also follows a local-first approach, allowing some data operations to function without continuously depending on remote servers. Compared with Notion, which must be accessed through a browser on Linux, Thought Desk aims to provide an experience closer to conventional desktop software.

However, Thought Desk remains in the early stages of development. The developer's planned features need to be distinguished from those available in released versions. This is particularly important for cross-device synchronization, collaboration, and Linux platform support, as product descriptions alone are insufficient to establish that these capabilities are mature.

Is Thought Desk's 49,000-Record Database Test Really Faster Than Notion?

In October 2026, Thought Desk attracted attention through performance figures shared in community promotions. According to the developer, the application could open a database containing approximately 49,000 records in just 0.14 seconds, with normal memory usage remaining below 160 MB. The developer also shared a separate test involving approximately 50,000 pages, claiming that its memory consumption remained lower than Notion's.

These figures can provide insight into the project's development goals, but there is currently insufficient independent testing to directly demonstrate that Thought Desk will consistently outperform Notion in everyday work.

First, the two applications load data differently. Notion involves remote data synchronization, permission verification, and collaboration services, whereas Thought Desk's tests primarily emphasize local data operations. If a benchmark measures only the time required to open a database view without including complete data loading, formula calculations, or network transfers, it cannot be used to compare their overall performance directly.

Second, an identical number of records does not imply an identical workload. A database containing only text and date properties may have very different hardware requirements from one containing large numbers of images, attachments, relationships, and formulas. Even if a tool can open tens of thousands of records quickly, that does not mean searching, editing, scrolling, or resynchronization will maintain the same speed.

Therefore, Thought Desk's performance claims are worth monitoring, but until tests are conducted using consistent environments and datasets, it would be inappropriate to present its supposed performance advantage over Notion as an established fact.

Has Thought Desk Already Released a Linux Desktop App?

Thought Desk had a v0.1.0 release record dated October 19, 2026, indicating that the project had progressed beyond the conceptual demonstration stage. However, the existence of this release record does not establish whether an official Linux installation package is available, nor does it guarantee that the application will run correctly across different Linux distributions.

The developer had previously announced in the community that Windows and Linux versions would be released within several weeks. Therefore, anyone evaluating the application should check the actual installation packages available through GitHub Releases rather than relying solely on release dates or the product roadmap.

Data migration is another area requiring further verification. Although Thought Desk plans to offer database and general data import features, directly importing a Notion workspace involves page hierarchies, database relationships, formulas, and attachments. It should not be treated as equivalent to importing an ordinary CSV table.

For users who need a Linux desktop note-taking application immediately, Thought Desk is better suited to a list of tools to monitor for future developments. Those planning to migrate substantial amounts of Notion data right away should prioritize tools with verifiable installation packages, import procedures, and backup methods.

Notion vs. Morrow vs. Thought Desk: Which Should You Choose? Comparing Linux Alternatives Including Joplin

Although Notion, Morrow, and Thought Desk all offer document or database management capabilities, they serve different purposes. Notion's main strengths lie in cloud collaboration and its integrated workspace features. Morrow focuses on local file management, while Thought Desk continues developing features for desktop performance and personal data management.

If the comparison is expanded to include established Linux note-taking applications, Joplin is also worth considering. Joplin is a free, open-source note-taking tool designed around an offline-first approach. It offers an official Linux desktop application, Markdown editing, full-text search, and several options for cross-device synchronization. Users can choose services such as Nextcloud, Dropbox, OneDrive, or Joplin Cloud.

However, Joplin primarily focuses on ordinary notes and to-do lists rather than fully replicating Notion's relational databases. It can meet the need for offline note-taking and cross-device access, but it may not be suitable for directly replacing workspaces that rely heavily on database automation and team permissions.

Comparison	Notion	Morrow	Thought Desk	Joplin
Linux desktop app	No official version	Linux builds are listed, but testing on actual devices remains limited	Early release records exist, but Linux installer availability remains unconfirmed	Officially supported
Offline use	Not supported in the Linux web version	Emphasizes local offline use	Emphasizes a local-first approach; Linux version requires verification	Supported
Data storage	Primarily cloud-based workspaces	Local Markdown files	Primarily local data management	Local database, with notes using Markdown formatting
Database features	Relationships, formulas, Rollups, multiple views	Tables, Kanban boards, relationships, and formulas	Offers database functionality, but maturity requires further testing	Primarily notes and to-do management
Collaboration	Comprehensive team collaboration and permission management	Primarily designed for individual use	Team features are still under development	Supports note sharing and some collaboration
Notion data migration	Not applicable	Claims to support importing data exported from Notion	Complete import capabilities remain unverified	Can import Markdown; databases require additional handling
Best suited for	Team projects and document management	Local knowledge bases and personal data management	Users interested in lightweight performance and emerging tools	Offline notes, research materials, and to-do lists

The information above is based on publicly available documentation as of October 22, 2026. Some features of Morrow and Thought Desk are based on developer-provided information and have not undergone comprehensive independent verification.

Should Teams Already Using Notion Databases Migrate Directly to Open-Source Tools?

If a workspace is primarily used to store meeting notes, personal articles, and research materials, migrating to a Markdown-based note-taking tool is relatively straightforward. However, if it contains multiple relational databases combined with formulas, Rollups, automation, and team permission management, the cost of migration increases significantly.

For example, a content team might use Notion to manage article schedules, create different databases organized around authors, categories, and publication dates, calculate progress with formulas, and then handle notifications through automated workflows. Even if a new tool can import each article and its date properties, the original relationship logic, view configurations, and automation may not carry over.

If the primary reason for switching to an open-source tool is to meet offline requirements on Linux, a hybrid approach may be worth considering first. Projects requiring collaboration can remain in Notion, while personal research notes and long-form writing can be managed using a local Markdown tool. This avoids having to rebuild every database at once and allows users to gradually determine whether the new file management approach meets their practical needs.

How to Export Notion Data to Linux: Limitations of Markdown and CSV

Notion supports export formats including Markdown, CSV, and HTML, allowing users to download individual pages or data from an entire workspace to their computers. However, Notion's official documentation also warns that exported content cannot simply be uploaded again to fully restore the original workspace. Although exporting data can preserve some content, it should not be treated as equivalent to a complete system backup.

For users planning to migrate Notion data to Morrow, Joplin, or other Linux note-taking tools, Markdown and CSV are usually good starting points. Ordinary pages are saved as Markdown files, while full-page databases are exported as CSV files. Subpages within databases can be generated as separate Markdown files, and the results are then organized into a compressed archive according to the selected export settings.

However, these formats have their own limitations. Markdown is better suited to preserving text, lists, and basic formatting, while CSV is useful for recording table properties and values. Neither format can fully represent all of Notion's relationship logic, formula configurations, database views, page permissions, or workflows.

What Data Might Not Be Fully Preserved When Exporting from Notion?

Different types of data produce different export results. Headings, paragraphs, text lists, and some images within ordinary documents are generally easier to preserve. However, special blocks, external embeds, and interactive elements may require format conversion or manual reconstruction.

Databases are more complicated. CSV can preserve many property values, but it cannot automatically teach other applications how Notion's formulas work. It also does not guarantee that the original relationships and Rollup functionality will continue working after import.

Furthermore, Notion's official documentation states that users can export only the current or default database view, rather than exporting every view configuration completely at once. If a workspace contains private pages that the user does not have permission to access, those pages will not automatically be included in the export.

These limitations mean exported files must be opened and inspected to determine whether they can serve as reliable migration data. This is especially important for workspaces containing hundreds of records, deeply nested subpages, and large numbers of attachments. Successfully downloading a ZIP file does not necessarily mean every piece of content has been completely preserved.

How Can You Reduce the Risk of Data Loss When Moving from Notion to Linux Note-Taking Tools?

Before beginning a full migration, users can start by testing the data they access most frequently. For example, select a database containing 20 to 50 records, including date, tag, formula, relationship, and attachment properties. Then create a test export using Notion's Markdown and CSV export features.

Next, import the data into the prospective replacement application and check whether the page hierarchy is correct, attachments can be opened, and database properties have been preserved. When testing Morrow, users can also verify that Markdown files are actually stored in the specified folder and remain readable through another editor after the application has been closed.

Testing should not end after the initial import. After modifying the data, restart the application to verify that text and property values have been saved. Then test how the application behaves when completely disconnected from the internet. If cross-device synchronization is planned, additional testing should examine how conflicts are handled when the same data is edited simultaneously on two devices.

Once these basic operations have been verified, expanding the import scope gradually is a safer approach. The original Notion workspace should be retained at least until data integrity and everyday functionality have passed validation. Important files should also be backed up separately rather than treating the new application's data folder as their only storage location.

Is Notion's Linux Version Still Worth Waiting For? Choosing Based on Offline Needs and Data Structure

As of October 2026, Notion has not announced a release date for an official Linux desktop application. For users accustomed to Notion's team collaboration features and relational databases, the web version can still handle most everyday tasks. If the main frustration is the absence of desktop tabs, browser tabs may provide a practical initial solution. Alternatively, users can evaluate whether unofficial clients such as Lotion meet their needs.

However, users who frequently need to write or organize research materials without an internet connection face a more significant limitation because Notion's Linux web version does not support the official offline feature. In these situations, local-first note-taking tools may be worth considering. Morrow provides Markdown-based file storage and database management, while Joplin has a longer history of Linux support and offline functionality.

Thought Desk's performance-oriented design is also worth monitoring, although its Linux installation packages, data import procedures, and practical stability still require verification. Morrow, meanwhile, already provides cross-platform builds, but the testing and compatibility concerns associated with its early development stage should not be overlooked.

Whether to replace Notion depends first on how existing work data is structured. If most content consists of personal articles and ordinary notes, Markdown-based applications can generally accommodate it more easily. However, workspaces involving extensive database relationships, automation, and collaborative editing require an assessment of the time needed to rebuild their functionality. This is particularly important for workspaces accumulated over many years. Until a new tool has been verified to read, edit, synchronize, and back up the data correctly, retaining the original Notion workspace is the safer option.

FAQs

SUPPORT FENGNIII

喜歡這篇文章嗎？

如果這篇內容對你有幫助，可以透過小額贊助支持本站持續整理更多日文、韓文、旅行與數位工具內容。

小額支持本站

付款將由藍新金流安全處理